Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetniy lane, 29, Moscow 119017, Russia
Microbiomorphic analysis is a detailed study of microscopic particles of biogenic nature (plant detritus, phytoliths, shells of diatoms, spicules of sponges, pollen, etc.). Each of such particles characterizes environmental conditions at the time of its formation and, therefore, provides useful information for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. The Early Pleistocene deposits were studied in Armenia at the sites, where tools of ancient hominids (Early Acheulian) were found. The genesis of these deposits was identified. It was shown that these ancient alluvial-lacustrine sediments were transformed by soil-forming processes. The environmental conditions at the time of the ancient hominids’ migration were reconstructed.
Key words: microbiomorphs, phytoliths, diatoms, reconstruction, Acheulian.
For citation: Golyeva A.A. Microbiomorphic analysis as part of micromorphological investigations: composition, diagnostics and informative capacity for paleoenvironmental reconstructions, Byulleten Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2016, Vol. 86, pp. 154-160. doi: 10.19047/0136-1694-2016-86-154-160
1. S. A. Aslanyan, E. V. Belyaeva, E. M. Kolpakov, V. P. Lyubin, G. M. Sarkisyan and A. V. Suvorov, “Research by the Armenian-Russian archaeological expedition 2003–2006”, The newsletter of the Inst. of Material Culture History, Russ. Acad. Sci., 2, 142–154 (2007) (in Russian).
2. E. V. Belyaeva and V. P. Lyubin “Preliminary data on the early stages of Acheulian in the Caucasus”, KSIA, Iss. 227, 28–36 (2012) (in Russian).
3. E. V. Belyaeva and V. P. Lyubin, “The Early Acheulian monuments in the north of Armenia”, In: Fundamental problems of archaeology, anthropology and ethnography of Eurasia. Dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Acad. A.P. Derevyanko (Novosibirsk, 2013) 37–52 (in Russian).
4. A. A. Golyeva, А. L. Aleksandrovsky, and L. K. Tselishcheva, “Phytolithic Analysis of Holocene Paleosols”, Pochvovedenie, 1994, 3, 34–40 (in Russian).
5. А. А. Golyeva, “Microbiomorphic analysis of the cultural layers of ancient settlements in the Central Russia”, In: Archaeology of the Moscow area: Proc. of scientific seminar. Iss. 5. (Moscow. Inst. of Archaeology, Russ. Acad. Sci. 2009) (in Russian).
6. А. А. Golyeva, Microbiomorphic complexes of natural and anthropogenic landscapes. Genesis, geography, informative capacity (LKI, Moscow, 2008) (inRussian).
7. А. А. Golyeva, “Microbiomorphic studies on soils and grounds from the burial mound of Filippovka 1”, In: Natural science methods of studying the burial mound of Filippovka 1. Materials and studies on archaeology of Russia. No. 15, Munchaev R.М. and Yablonsky L.T. (Eds.) (Institute of Archaeology, Russ. Acad. Sci. TAUS, Moscow, 2011) 46–63 (in Russian).
8. А. А. Golyeva, “Phytoliths – sources of information on the nature and peoples life in the past”, In: Palaeosols, environment and their study methods, G.V. Dobrovol’skii and M.I. Dergacheva (Eds.) (ОFSEТ, Novosibirsk, 2012) (in Russian).
9. V. P. Lyubin and E. V. Belyaeva, “New data of the Early Paleolithic Age in Armenia”, Ancient inhabitants of Caucasus and distribution of ancient hominids over Eurasia (St. Petersburg, 2010) (in Russian).
10. V. P. Lyubin and E. V. Belyaeva, “The Early Acheulian monument of Karakhach in the north of Armenia”. Archaeological newsletter, 17, 13–19 (2011) (in Russian).
11. Yu. F. Kiryushin, K. Yu. Kiryushin, А. А. Golyeva and V.P. Semibratov, “Pedological and microbiomorphic studies on the Tavdinsky grotto”, Altai science newsletter, 1, 123–127 (2012) (in Russian).
12. O. Khokhlova, E. Stolpnikova and N. Kovaleva, “Genesis of the Early Pleistocene paleosols of Armenia evidenced by set of methods”, In: Paleopedological record of postglacial soil and landscape evolution. XIIIth International Symposium and Field Workshop on Paleopedology (ISFWP), 1–6 September (Torun, Poland, 2014).
13. O. S. Khokhlova, A. A. Khokhlov, A. M. Kuznetsova, E. M. Stolpnikova, N. O. Kovaleva, V. P. Lyubin, and E. V. Belyaeva, “Carbonate features in the uppermost layers of Quaternary deposits, Northern Armenia, and their significance for paleoenvironmental reconstruction”, Quaternary International, (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.035
14. E. Messager, D. Lordkipanidze, C. Delhon, and C. R. “Ferring Palaeoecological implications of the Lower Pleistocene phytolith record from the Dmanisi Site (Georgia)”, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 288, 1–13 (2010) doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.01.020
15. E. Messager, S. Nomade, P. Voinchet, R. Ferring, A. Mgeladze, H. Guillou, and D. Lordkipanidze “40Ar/39Ar dating and phytolith analysis of the Early Pleistocene sequence of Kvemo-Orozmani (Republic of Georgia): chronological and palaeoecological implications for the hominin site of Dmanisi”, Quaternary Science Reviews,30, 3099–3108. (2011). doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.07.008
16. S. L. Presnyakov, E. V. Belyaeva, V.P. Lyubin, N. V. Rodionov, A. V. Antonov, A. K. Saltykova, N. G. Berezhnaya, and S. A. Sergeev, “Age of the earliest Paleolithic sites in the northern part of the Armenian Highland by SHRIMP-II U-Pb dating of zircons from volcanic ashes”, Gondwana Research, 21, 928–938 (2012).
17. S. N. Sedov, O. S. Khokhlova, and A.M. Kuznetso, “Polygenesis of volcanic paleosols in Armenia and Mexico: micromorphological records of climate variations in the Quaternary Period”, Eurasian Soil Science, 44(7), 766–780 (2011).
18. V. G. Trifonov, V. P. Lyubin, E. V. Belyaeva, V. A. Lebedev, Ya. I. Trikhunkov, A. S. Tesakov, A. N. Simakova, R. V. Veselovsky, A. V. Latyshev, S. L. Presnyakov, T. P. Ivanova, D. V. Ozhereliev, D. M. Bachmanov, S. M. Lyapunova, “Stratigraphic and tectonic settings of Early Paleolithic of North-West Armenia”, Quaternary International, (2016) (in press). doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.019